(foto: //)
From Saudi takeovers to fan protests, modern football faces a power struggle between capital, community, and culture — redefining who truly owns the game and what it stands for.
When Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund bought Newcastle United in 2021, fans celebrated a long-awaited revival. But behind the euphoria lay a deeper question — who truly controls football? Ownership has evolved from local passion projects into global power plays, where clubs serve as assets, brands, and sometimes political tools.
In the sport’s earlier days, clubs were community anchors. Wealthy locals funded them for love, not leverage, and supporters defined success by trophies and pride. That era feels distant now. Modern football is a battlefield where sovereign wealth funds, private equity groups, and billionaire investors shape the future — often at odds with fan identity and cultural heritage.
Germany stands almost alone in resistance. Its 50+1 rule ensures members keep voting control, protecting clubs from complete corporate takeover. Critics say it limits competitiveness, but to many supporters, it safeguards integrity. At Borussia Dortmund, the famous Yellow Wall isn’t just atmosphere — it’s a statement of ownership philosophy.
England, by contrast, is a mirror of global capitalism. Manchester City serve as a state-backed success story for Abu Dhabi, intertwining dominance with soft power. Manchester United remain burdened by the Glazer family’s leveraged ownership, while Chelsea under Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital epitomize the American investment model, where players are assets and contracts, not icons.
Even the supposed bastions of democracy — Barcelona and Real Madrid — face contradictions. Their member-owned structures survive, but in 2021 La Liga’s €2 billion deal with CVC Capital Partners traded a portion of future broadcast revenues for immediate funds. When the courts upheld the deal in 2024, it exposed the reality that even member control has limits in the age of capital.
Motivations across ownership vary widely. For Gulf states, football is soft power and diplomacy. For private equity, it’s return on investment. For celebrities like Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney at Wrexham, it’s a storytelling platform — a blend of sport, content, and commerce.
Yet amid this, fans still hold cultural power. The 2021 European Super League collapse showed that collective protest can alter history, forcing billionaires into retreat. But this influence remains reactive, not institutional. Ticket prices soar, kick-offs shift for global audiences, and governance rarely prioritizes the terrace voice.
Regulation is evolving but often too slowly. UEFA’s financial controls and the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability rules monitor spending, yet ownership remains opaque. The UK’s new Independent Football Regulator (IFR) promises oversight, but whether it can contain global capital remains uncertain.
Ultimately, football’s ownership is fragmented — divided between states that see it as strategy, investors who see it as opportunity, and fans who live it as identity. The future of the game won’t be defined by goals or trophies alone, but by who controls its meaning. In that battle between capital and culture lies the soul of football itself.